Letter to Ontario Party Leaders

Via email
September 27, 2011.

Dalton McGuinty, Premier and Leader, Liberal Party of Ontario
vote@daltonmcguinty.ca

Tim Hudak, Leader, Progressive Conservative Party
timhudak@niagara.net and tim.hudak@pc.ola.org

Andrea Horvath, Leader, New Democratic Party of Ontario
andreahorvath@ontariondp.ca

 

Mike Schreiner, Leader, Green Party of Ontario
mschreiner@gpo.ca

Dear Ontario Party Leaders:

Re: Waste Diversion Act review and policies for a Zero Waste Future for a healthy Ontario

First, the Ontario Zero Waste Coalition wishes to commend you on your candidacies in the upcoming
election. We wish you the best of luck.

Second, we wish to commend the current government on some of the progress made around energy
policies in their last term and the preliminary steps taken to review the Waste Diversion Act and move
on Zero Waste policies.

Third, having watched the leadership debate and recognizing that the issue of waste, an issue that
affects all municipalities and citizens in Ontario, was never raised, the Ontario Zero Waste Coalition
wants to remind all of the Province’s leaders that waste reduction and management must be a part of
your agenda.

We note that the Association of Municipalities of Ontario recently took out two full pages
of advertising to highlight this issue. We want to ensure that as party leaders, all of you are aware of our concerns around the gaps in Ontario’s current waste policy framework and our concerns about the
erratic Environmental Assessment process that is used to evaluate many projects in Ontario. Currently,
the Ministry of Health has no direct role in project reviews and to ensure public health impacts of waste
(and other) projects are properly identified, considered and addressed from a medical and scientific
perspective.

Ontarians require a clear policy framework so that governments make evidence‐based decisions based
on solid information, which employ the precautionary principle where uncertainty exists. Coherent,
integrated policies are required to ensure that provincial review and evaluation processes arrive at
sound decisions that are defensible.

Ontarians require evidence-based decisions around waste projects and especially for incinerators. The
recent Minister and Ministry of Environment approvals for the Durham‐York incinerator set a dangerous
precedent and could undermine efforts to improve air quality and public health outcomes in Ontario.

There has been no response to the two letters as described in Sections A) and B) below.

A).On April 27, 2011, members of the Ontario Zero Waste Coalition presented a set of recommendations
to representatives of the Ministry of the Environment. We include our original recommendations and
have updated some in light of information available since April 2011 and have attached our letter of
April 27th. We urge all parties to consider our recommendations and urge Ontario’s next government to
consider and act on them.

10 Recommendations of the Ontario Zero Waste Coalition

1. Move forward as swiftly as possible, to introduce a new Waste Diversion Act, that will propel us to the
Zero Waste Future that former Environment Minister Gerretsen promised in 2008. The Province’s
strategy must focus on “why are we generating so much waste” rather than on “what do we do with it”.
With that focus, action must revolve around ways to REDUCE, reuse, recycle, compost — in that order.

2. Repeal the March 2007 exemption from the Environmental Assessment Act this government gave to
pilot and demonstration incineration projects with a maximum capacity of 75 tonnes per day. Plasco
has processed only a tiny fraction of their permitted maximums yet has recorded emissions exceedances
between 2008 and 2010. Plasco have prepared an Environmental Screening Report and now seek
approval for a permanent commercial operation that would process additional non‐residential waste,
though their demonstration plant failed to meet claims and incurred at least 25 records on noncompliance
of emissions.

3. Ban new municipal waste incinerators as they are a risky, inefficient and expensive disposal option
that pollute our air, land and water and area associated with serious health effects.
Ban existing incinerators from burning recyclables and compostable materials and require a secondary
sort to remove such materials for approved incinerators.
We ask that the next government reintroduce legislation that would ban the building of new
incinerators/gasification/plasma arc/pyrolysis plants for municipal waste. These projects have a long
history of operating problems, cost overruns and put‐or‐pay contracts that can bankrupt municipalities.
As well, incinerators generate emissions that are a danger to public health and greenhouse gases that
add to global warming. In a world where over‐consumption is at the heart of most of our problems it
makes no sense to burn resources. The operator chosen to design, build and operate the Durham‐York
incinerator has a record of emissions violations at many plants they operate in the United States.
There has been a litany of errors associated with the Ministry of the Environment’s review of the
Durham‐York incinerator Environmental Assessment and Certificates of Approvals applications. The
validity of the health risk assessment has been called into question and recent information indicates
there would be an unacceptable incremental health risk attributable to the incinerator.

4. Issue a clear statement backed up by policies, to municipalities and incineration companies, that
incineration is not “green energy” and that the government will not support it or subsidize it.
The incineration industry is engaged in “greenwashing”, promoting incineration as green energy and
garbage as a renewable resource. In the absence of clear policy, municipal politicians are actively
promoting incinerators as a “green” solution to garbage and incinerators as the kind of business they
want to attract to new green or energy business parks.

5. End taxpayer‐funded incentives and subsidies to the incineration industry.
In December 2008, former Ontario Energy and Infrastructure Minister George Smitherman added
impetus to the Plasco Ottawa incinerator by directing the Ontario Power Authority to purchase
electricity from it at a rate of 8 cents per kilowatt‐hour ‐ almost three times the resale rate and
representing a significant taxpayer subsidy. A similar directive for the same price was issued for the
Durham‐York incinerator.
Plasco received $5.9 million from Sustainable Development Technology Canada, a $4 million noninterest
loan from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and $8 million a year from city of Ottawa. If
the government has money to invest it should be spent on recycling, reuse and composting plants that
will create more jobs and have more benefits for people and the environment.

6. Work with municipalities to standardize diversion policies across Ontario.
Many municipalities around the Province are still not separating organics. Given that organics in landfills
are a major source of methane and that organics comprises 40 to 60 % of all municipal waste and that
composting it creates a valuable commodity, why can’t Green Bins be mandated? Business likes
certainty. If entrepreneurs were confident about the types and quantities of materials being diverted
you can be sure they will create businesses to recycle/reuse/compost it, creating more jobs here in
Ontario in the process.

7. Implement diversion targets for municipalities and require reporting to ensure targets are met.
Many municipalities are jumping to incineration without even harvesting the low hanging fruit of waste
reduction like organics collection.

8. Find a way to include First Nations Communities in blue box, take‐it‐back and other producersponsored
diversion programs.

9. Redesign Stewardship Ontario so there is citizen oversight. The problems with E‐waste collection, as
outlined by the Toronto Star on May 11 2010 and recent articles about the Eco Fee fiasco should
highlight that you cannot leave foxes in charge of the henhouse.
Product Stewardship programs should ensure that producers have incentives to make products that are
easier to recycle, less harmful and result in less residual waste.

10. Reinstate Eco fees “on the shelf” not “at the counter”. We should be looking to incentivize the things
we want (i.e. less toxic, better packaged products) and discourage those we don’t (i.e. toxic and
wastefully packaged ones). Because we don’t consider a product’s cost to the environment, many
“green” products cost more than less‐environment‐friendly ones. Put the “eco tax” on the shelf price so
consumers can make wiser choices.

B) Need for Independent Review of Health Risks Associated with Incineration and as well as a Review
of Approvals for Durham‐York Incinerator.

On September 15, 2011, a letter was sent to the Ministers of Health and the Environment describing the
failure of both ministries to ensure that the health and ecological risk assessment for the Durham‐York
incinerator properly assessed the health risks related to emissions of particulate matter smaller than 2.5
microns (PM 2.5). The letter was written on behalf of and endorsed by three Durham Region based
groups who had previously identified serious deficiencies in the Environmental Assessment studies.
The September 15th letter requests an immediate review of the recent EA and C of A approvals for the
Durham –York Incinerator in light of identified health risks. Furthermore, the next administration must
require a review of the health risks associated with incineration to be conducted by independent,
qualified medical and scientific experts. Policies will need to be revised in accordance with these
findings.

As recent events and the promised scrapping of two natural gas plants demonstrate, political decisions
often have unforeseen and usually expensive consequences. This would be an opportune time for the
next Premier to require a review the Durham-York approvals. As they stand, they set a dangerous
precedent and would undermine Ontario’s efforts to improve air quality, public health outcomes,
conservation of resources and protection and preservation of our natural environment.

We learned in a recent news article that the incinerator operator, Covanta Energy of New Jersey, is
looking for a new general contractor. This may delay the construction timeline envisioned by the
Regions. No building permit has been applied for yet by the proponents nor has site approval been
granted by the host community .

In conclusion, we urge Ontario’s party leaders to consider our concerns and if elected, to commit to:
1) completing the Waste Diversion Act Review considering our specific recommendations above;
2) implementing Zero Waste policies and Product Stewardship programs that provide incentives to
make products that are easier to recycle, less harmful and result in less residual waste.
3) Banning new municipal solid waste incinerators. Ban approved incinerators from burning
recyclables and compostable material and require a secondary sort.
4) Undertake a review of the health effects of incineration by independent, qualified medical and
scientific experts.
5) Undertake a review of the Durham‐York incinerator Environmental Assessment approval and
Certificates of Approval in light of concerns raised and health review results.

Yours truly,

Liz Benneian
Founder
Ontario Zero Waste Coalition
3150 Culp Road, Jordan Station, ON L0R 1S0
lizcdn@yahoo.com
905-562-3819

Jake Cole (Co‐Chair)
Prevent Cancer Now
99 Fifth Avenue, No. 138 Ottawa, ON, K1S 5P5
613-755-0110
info@preventcancernow.ca
http://preventcancernow.ca

Linda Gasser,
Co‐founder ZeroWaste4ZeroBurning
111 Ferguson Street, Whitby, ON, L1N 2X7
gasserlinda@gmail.com
905‐665‐5789
www.zerowasteforzeroburning.ca

Louis Bertrand
Co‐founder of ZeroWaste4ZeroBurning
124 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville, ON, L1C 2M3
Louis@bertrandtech.ca
905‐259‐8925
www.zerowasteforzeroburning.ca

Kerry Meydam
Founder
Durham Environment Watch
3828 Trulls Road, Courtice, ON L1E 2L3
ksam2@rogers.com
905‐436‐2252
www.durhamenvironmentwatch.org

Karen Brock,
President,
Oakvillegreen Conservation Association
2089 Nipigon Trail, Oakville, ON, L6H 4G3
905‐844‐2608
president@oakvillegreen.org
www.oakvillegreen.org

Ken Woodruff
President,
BulingtonGreen Environmental Association
3281 Myers Lane, Burlington, ON, L7N 1K6
905‐335‐5226
kwoodruff@cogeco.ca
www.burlingtongreen.org

Libby Racansky
Founder,
Friends of the Farewell (FOF)
3200 Hancock Road, Courtice, ON, L1E 2M1
libby.stan@sympatico.ca
www.fof‐clarington.com

Cheryl Waldick
Chair
No WTE Brant
644 Oak Park Road, Brantford Ontario N3T 5L8
519‐756‐0214
nowtebrant@gmail.com
www.nowastetoenergy.ca

Doug Anderson,
President
DurhamCLEAR Inc.
3452 Courtice Rd., Courtice, Ontario
doughfanderson@sympatico.ca
http://durhamclear.ca

Jim Steeves
Chair
Miltongreen
288 Bousfield Crescent, Milton, Ontario.
905‐878‐0995
www.miltongreen.info
Miltongreen.ontario@gmail.com

Ella Haley, Acting Chair,
Sustainable Brant
27 Ronald Rd., R. R. 8 Brantford, ON, N3T 5M1
519‐647‐0307
ehaley1@gmail.com
http://sustainablebrant.blogspot.com

Val O’Donnell
President
Preservation of Agricultural Lands Society
Box 1090 St. Catharines L2R 7AZ
905‐468‐2841
pals@becon.org
http://people.becon.org/~pals

Gloria Marsh
Executive Director
York Region Environmental Alliance
225 Lakeland Crescent, Richmond Hill, ON, L4E 3A5
905‐773‐4028
gloria@yrea.org
www.yrea.org

Encl.

  1. April 27, 2011 letter from Ontario Zero Waste Coalition to the Ministry of the Environment
  2. September 15, 2011 letter from Wendy Bracken to the Ministers of the Environment and Health on behalf of DurhamEnvironmentWatch, Durham CLEAR and ZeroWaste4ZeroBurningZeroBurning